Church and State

How the register is built, what each status means, and how to contribute.

1,390 buildings in the registerregister · updated —

About this register

A reader's companion to The Guardian's reporting on the UK's derelict churches.

"Abandoned" is not a category that appears in any official record. A closed church might be redundant to one body, at risk on another's register, and in the same year vested in a conservation charity that will spend a decade on its roof. This register tries to hold those categories together on one map, so that a reader can see what is actually happening to a building rather than only what happened to its paperwork.

It currently carries 1,390 churches, chapels and meeting houses across England and Wales — every Heritage at Risk place of worship in England, every building in the Friends of Friendless Churches gazetteer, every church the Churches Conservation Trust looks after, plus a small editorial spine of buildings drawn directly from the reporting series. 99% of the records carry a photograph, 96% carry a denomination, and the 928 English buildings on Heritage at Risk now carry the full National Heritage List for England listing description on their pages.

What the status colours mean

Cluster bubbles on the map take the dominant status colour of the buildings inside them — madder where risk concentrates, verdigris where the register has been taken into care, stone where closures and losses dominate.

How to use it

Sources the register draws from

Coverage gaps to be honest about: Heritage at Risk is England-only, so the at-risk colour misses Welsh and Scottish buildings until DataMapWales / Cadw and the Buildings at Risk Register for Scotland are added. CofE buildings still in active use (the largest single category of UK churches) aren't here at all — the register is about the closing, the closed and the saved.

How the data is built

A suite of Python scripts in the project's build/ directory pulls each source into a normalised record, joins the geography and photos, and writes a single data/buildings.json the frontend reads. A GitHub Action runs the pipeline nightly. Source code, including every step of the ingest, is on GitHub under MIT.

Every record carries a provenance string at the bottom of its sidebar — the honest record of where its information came from and how far we'd stand behind it. Status classifications follow a single rule: condition data drives the colour, the custodian decides whether it reads as at risk or preserved. We err toward conservatism — a church the National Heritage List rates "Fair" or worse with no funded plan stays in at risk.

How to contribute

Every building page has an Add to the record button. It sends your note to an editorial queue — nothing is published automatically. We are particularly interested in:

Editorial notes

This is journalism, not a definitive register. Where two sources disagreed about a building's status, condition or denomination, we kept the more conservative classification. Where Wikidata or a Wikipedia link was available we surfaced it on the building page; that doesn't mean every Wikipedia article matches the building it's linked to perfectly. Every record links back to its primary source so you can take the chain of evidence further.

The basemap is OpenStreetMap; coordinates are to street or village level. The map marker is a sign-pointing pin, not a surveyor's stake.