Provenance manifest: US-Iran war and Hormuz negotiations
Output: index.html in this folder (web version of this manifest: manifest.html). Storyline 2 of storylines-data/trump-administration.json.
Built by outputs/explainer-kit/build.py, which checks every quote and figure below against the fetched article text.
Every piece of text on the page is listed in the order it appears. Headings, labels and instructions are marked as such: they make no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page.
Two parts of the page are generated straight from the Storylines data and are not listed entry by entry: the chain of five key stories in the header and the Read more list. Both reproduce each article's headline, byline and publication date exactly as the Guardian published them. The line under the title counts the text articles in the Storyline and gives the span of their publication dates.
Header
1The US has been at war with Iran since February.
- SourceTrump calls on allies to enforce ‘complete economic isolation of Iran’ in UN speech (22 September 2026)
- Supports
since the US and Israel launched joint strikes in February
2Now Iran is offering to reopen a vital oil route within days, on terms that would require difficult concessions from Donald Trump.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
Iran’s seven-day timetable to reopen the strait of Hormuz and start talks on its nuclear programme has been pitched as a deal that could rapidly extricate Donald Trump from a political crisis but requires the US president to make difficult concessions.
In short
3In short
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
4The US and Israel launched joint strikes on Iran in February.
- SourceTrump calls on allies to enforce ‘complete economic isolation of Iran’ in UN speech (22 September 2026)
- Supports
since the US and Israel launched joint strikes in February
5Since early in the war Iran has had a stranglehold on energy shipping through the strait of Hormuz,
- SourceTrump calls on allies to enforce ‘complete economic isolation of Iran’ in UN speech (22 September 2026)
- Supports
Iran has maintained a stranglehold over energy shipping through the strait of Hormuz since early in the war
6and reopening it is expected to relieve pressure on global energy markets.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
the proposed reopening of the strait, which is expected to relieve pressure on global energy markets
7The war is hugely unpopular in the US, the Guardian reports.
- SourceIran denies dropping preconditions amid ‘very productive’ three-hour UN talks in New York (23 September 2026)
- Supports
a hugely unpopular war that the Americans think they are losing
8Congress’s budget office puts the cost at $38bn or more, and the House of Representatives has voted three times to end it.
- SourceUS House votes for third time to end Iran war after $38bn cost is revealed (15 September 2026)
- Supports
The US House of Representatives has voted for a third time to end the war in Iran
- Supports
a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report showed the conflict had cost at least $38bn
9During the UN general assembly in New York, Iran offered to reopen the strait within days if the US makes big concessions, including an end to the fighting in Lebanon. Iran is waiting for Trump’s answer.
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
Iran said it has told Donald Trump it is willing to open the strait of Hormuz in six days
- Supports
so long as the US lifts sanctions on Iran’s oil exports in return, ends the war on all fronts – including in Lebanon – and releases some of Iran’s frozen assets
- Supports
Abbas Araghchi, the Iranian foreign minister, said he was waiting to hear a response from the Americans to the proposal.
The basics
10The basics
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
11What is the strait of Hormuz?
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
12A key waterway for transporting oil.
- SourceIran denies dropping preconditions amid ‘very productive’ three-hour UN talks in New York (23 September 2026)
- Supports
a key waterway for transporting oil
13Oman lies on its south side.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
Oman, located on the south side of the strait
14The latest published figures suggest fewer than five identifiable tankers a day are getting through, though US navy estimates are much higher.
- SourceIran denies dropping preconditions amid ‘very productive’ three-hour UN talks in New York (23 September 2026)
- Supports
Latest published figures suggest the number of identifiable tankers making it through the strait is fewer than five a day, but estimates of the US navy are much higher.
15What was the June deal?
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
16On 17 June the US and Iran agreed a memorandum of understanding.
- SourceIran denies dropping preconditions amid ‘very productive’ three-hour UN talks in New York (23 September 2026)
- Supports
He has said the memorandum of understanding (MoU), agreed with the US on 17 June, remained the starting point.
17Trump signed it.
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
the Islamabad memorandum of understanding that was signed by Trump
18Its implementation fell apart after each side accused the other of breaking it by trying to take control of the strait, though Iran’s president says it remains the starting point.
- SourceIran denies dropping preconditions amid ‘very productive’ three-hour UN talks in New York (23 September 2026)
- Supports
Implementation of the MoU fell apart after the two sides accused one another of breaching its terms by trying to take control of the strait.
- Supports
He has said the memorandum of understanding (MoU), agreed with the US on 17 June, remained the starting point.
19How is the US squeezing Iran?
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
20Through sanctions and a naval blockade that makes it nearly impossible for Iran to export oil, depriving it of badly needed foreign currency.
- SourceIran denies dropping preconditions amid ‘very productive’ three-hour UN talks in New York (23 September 2026)
- Supports
Iran is under ever more intense pressure from sanctions, and a US naval blockade is making it nearly impossible for Iran to export oil, depriving the country of badly needed foreign currency.
What happened, in order
21What happened, in order
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
22The US and Israel launched joint strikes on Iran.
- SourceTrump calls on allies to enforce ‘complete economic isolation of Iran’ in UN speech (22 September 2026)
- Supports
since the US and Israel launched joint strikes in February
23February
- NoteThe UN speech article dates the joint strikes to “February” without a year.
24The war begins
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
25The US and Iran agreed a memorandum of understanding on 17 June; its implementation later fell apart.
- SourceIran denies dropping preconditions amid ‘very productive’ three-hour UN talks in New York (23 September 2026)
- Supports
agreed with the US on 17 June
- Supports
Implementation of the MoU fell apart
26In June and July the House passed resolutions to end US action in Iran.
- SourceUS House votes for third time to end Iran war after $38bn cost is revealed (15 September 2026)
- Supports
The House first approved a war powers resolution in June and followed up with another one in July, all seeking to halt US action in Iran.
27June–July
- NoteMonths as given in the articles.
28A deal, and votes to end the war
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
29A Congressional Budget Office report put the cost of the war at $38bn or more, and estimated it would grow by $3bn for every month it continues, depending on its intensity. Defending against Iranian missiles and drones has used up so many interceptor missiles that rebuilding the stockpile “would probably take at least five years, even if production was increased”, the CBO said.
- SourceUS House votes for third time to end Iran war after $38bn cost is revealed (15 September 2026)
- Supports
showed the conflict had cost at least $38bn
- Supports
It estimated that the costs of the war will grow $3bn for every month the conflict continues, depending on its intensity
- Supports
Fending off Iranian ballistic missiles and drones has consumed such a large share of the US stockpile of Patriot, Thaad and navy interceptors that the CBO said rebuilding it “would probably take at least five years, even if production was increased”.
30A few hours after the report, the House voted 220 to 204 to end the war, its third such vote.
- SourceUS House votes for third time to end Iran war after $38bn cost is revealed (15 September 2026)
- Supports
approving a war powers resolution a few hours after a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report
- Supports
The final tally of 220-204 was similar to earlier votes
31In a White House statement responding to reports of shortages, Trump said the US had “far more munitions than anyone in the world”.
- SourceUS House votes for third time to end Iran war after $38bn cost is revealed (15 September 2026)
- Supports
In a White House statement responding to reports of shortages, Donald Trump said the US had “far more munitions than anyone in the world”
32None of the House resolutions has reached the president, who would almost certainly veto them.
- SourceUS House votes for third time to end Iran war after $38bn cost is revealed (15 September 2026)
- Supports
None of the resolutions have made it to the president’s desk, where Trump would almost certainly veto them.
33Earlier, the Senate also passed one, on its 10th attempt, but Republican senators reversed course the next day after Trump berated them.
- SourceUS House votes for third time to end Iran war after $38bn cost is revealed (15 September 2026)
- Supports
The Senate on its 10th try also approved a war powers resolution to end the conflict, but Republican senators quickly reversed course the next day after Trump berated them during a closed-door lunch.
34The Pentagon’s own review of the war, released the day before, did not address its internal investigation into a strike on a school in Minab on the war’s first day, which killed 156 people, including 120 children.
- SourceUS House votes for third time to end Iran war after $38bn cost is revealed (15 September 2026)
- Supports
The economic report came a day after the Pentagon’s inspector general finally released its own first review of the war
- Supports
The Pentagon’s report did not address its own internal investigation of the Minab school strike on the first day of the war, which killed 156 people including 120 children.
35Tuesday 15 Sept
- NoteDate: the article, published on 15 September 2026, says the vote was “late on Tuesday”; 15 September 2026 was a Tuesday.
36The bill arrives
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
37In a speech to the UN general assembly, Trump said: “I call on all nations to help to enforce the complete economic isolation of Iran.” He said he had a “big decision” to make: a deal, or “do I annihilate the Islamic republic and do it quickly”.
- SourceTrump calls on allies to enforce ‘complete economic isolation of Iran’ in UN speech (22 September 2026)
- Supports
“I call on all nations to help to enforce the complete economic isolation of Iran,” Trump said in a speech to the UN general assembly on Tuesday.
- Supports
“I have a big decision to make: will a deal be made with Iran that let them rebuild and create a far greater country than ever was before,” he said. “Or do I annihilate the Islamic republic and do it quickly, never giving them a chance to kill or destroy people and continents?”
38He said the midterm elections would not affect his decisions: “The only thing that does is that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon.”
- SourceTrump calls on allies to enforce ‘complete economic isolation of Iran’ in UN speech (22 September 2026)
- Supports
said the midterm elections would have absolutely no influence on his decision-making around the conflict
- Supports
The only thing that does is that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon.
39Tuesday 22 Sept
- NoteDate: the article, published on 22 September 2026, says the speech was “on Tuesday”.
40Trump at the UN
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
41Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, met Trump’s envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner for three hours at the UN headquarters, with Qatar mediating. Trump said the talks had been very productive, and the price of Brent crude oil fell below $100 a barrel for the first time in two weeks.
- SourceIran denies dropping preconditions amid ‘very productive’ three-hour UN talks in New York (23 September 2026)
- Supports
in surprise talks held in New York under the mediation of Qatar between Tehran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, and Donald Trump’s envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner
- Supports
Trump said the three-hour talks held in a room at the UN headquarters had gone very well and been very productive.
- Supports
which led to the price of a barrel of Brent crude to fall to below $100 (£75) for the first time in two weeks
42Iran denied it had dropped its conditions. Its foreign ministry said the aim was to convey demands including “the end of the war in all its dimensions”.
- SourceIran denies dropping preconditions amid ‘very productive’ three-hour UN talks in New York (23 September 2026)
- Supports
Iran has pushed back on claims that it dropped former preconditions for reopening the strait of Hormuz
- Supports
This interaction was aimed at conveying Iran’s conditions, including the end of the war in all its dimensions
43Reported 23 Sept
- NoteThe article, published on 23 September 2026, does not give the day of the talks.
44Talks in a UN room
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
45Iran said it had told Trump it would reopen the strait and start nuclear talks within a week if the US met its conditions. “We have introduced a plan to the US through the mediators,” Araghchi said.
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
Iran said it has told Donald Trump it is willing to open the strait of Hormuz in six days, and to start talks on its nuclear program the day after
- Supports
“We have introduced a plan to the US through the mediators that if certain conditions are met, the strait will be open within seven days and talks will start.”
46Saudi Arabia had been expected to endorse the new shipping route the week before but pulled back, partly out of anger at attacks on it by the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen.
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
Saudi Arabia had been expected to endorse the Oman-Iran route through the strait last week, but pulled back partly due to anger that Iranian-backed Houthis had started attacking Saudi Arabia
47Brent crude was trading at about $107 a barrel,
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
Brent crude was trading at about $107 (£81) a barrel on Thursday.
48against $64 before the fighting.
- SourceUS House votes for third time to end Iran war after $38bn cost is revealed (15 September 2026)
- Supports
Brent crude jumped from $64 a barrel before the fighting
- NotePre-war price from the CBO article; see Checks on oil prices.
49Thursday 24 Sept
- NoteDate: the article, published on 24 September 2026, gives the oil price “on Thursday”; 24 September 2026 was a Thursday.
50Iran’s offer
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
Diagram: Iran’s seven-day timetable
51Days 1 to 5
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
52The US acts
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
53Up to the US
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
54Lift the naval blockade on Iran’s oil ports
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
the US would have to lift the naval blockade on Iran’s oil ports
55Restore the waiver that lifted sanctions on Iran’s oil exports
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
restore the waiver that lifted sanctions on Iran’s oil exports
56End the war on all fronts
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
end the war on all fronts
57Allow the release of some of Iran’s frozen assets
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
permit the release of some of Iran’s frozen assets
58Patrick Wintour writes that the hardest step for Trump is probably ordering Benjamin Netanyahu to end Israel’s attacks on Hezbollah in Lebanon.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
probably most difficult of all, order Benjamin Netanyahu to end Israel’s attacks on Hezbollah in Lebanon
59Iranian diplomats say a deal would be feasible if Trump could rein in Netanyahu in Lebanon.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
Other Iranian diplomats say Trump’s willingness to rein in Netanyahu in Lebanon remains key. If he could do that, a deal would be feasible.
60The catch
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
61Day 6
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
62The strait reopens
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
63Up to Iran
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
64Iran reopens the strait of Hormuz
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
On the sixth day, the strait of Hormuz would be reopened by Iran
65Ships use a new route designated by Oman and Iran
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
with ships using a new route designated by Oman and Iran
66The new route runs mainly through Iranian waters. Wintour writes that the strait would reopen largely on Iran’s terms.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
It is a difficult deal for Trump to swallow since the strait would reopen largely on Iran’s terms, with the new route predominantly going through Iranian waters.
67Saudi Arabia is concerned that the route deal is between Iran and Oman only, without the other Gulf states as joint signatories.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
Saudi Arabia is also concerned that the route deal is bilateral between Iran and Oman, and not with the Gulf states as joint signatories.
68The catch
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
69Day 7
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
70Nuclear talks begin
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
71Both sides
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
72Talks start on the future of Iran’s civil nuclear programme
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
negotiations would start on the future of Iran’s civil nuclear programme
73Including a protocol to let UN nuclear inspectors back in to Iran’s damaged sites and its stockpile of highly enriched uranium
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
including a protocol to allow UN nuclear inspectors back in to look at Iran’s damaged sites and the stockpile of highly enriched uranium
74Under the June agreement, these talks would not have started for 60 days.
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
Talks on the nuclear program under the MoU would not have started for 60 days.
75The catch
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
76Days 1 to 7
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
77When would nuclear talks begin?
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
78June agreement
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
from 60 days in the June agreement to seven
79Day 60
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
from 60 days in the June agreement
80Iran’s new offer
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
to seven
81Day 7
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
This accelerates the point at which nuclear talks would begin, from 60 days in the June agreement to seven.
- Note“Seven” is shown as the figure 7.
82Iran’s seven-day timetable
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
83Iran’s offer, as reported by the Guardian from New York on 25 September.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
Iran’s seven-day timetable to reopen the strait of Hormuz and start talks on its nuclear programme
- NoteThe article was published on 25 September 2026 with the dateline New York.
84A Guardian headline the day before described it as opening the strait “in six days”:
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
Iran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days
From the headline or standfirst, not the body text
85the strait reopens on day six and nuclear talks follow on day seven.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
On the sixth day, the strait of Hormuz would be reopened by Iran
- Supports
And on the next day, negotiations would start
86Select a stage to see what it involves.
- NoteInstruction to the reader.
Who’s who, and where they stand
87Who’s who, and where they stand
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
88Says he must choose between a deal and whether to “annihilate the Islamic republic”, and that the only thing on his mind is that “Iran will never have a nuclear weapon”.
- SourceTrump calls on allies to enforce ‘complete economic isolation of Iran’ in UN speech (22 September 2026)
- Supports
Or do I annihilate the Islamic republic and do it quickly
- Supports
“It doesn’t even enter my mind. The only thing that does is that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon.”
89Donald Trump
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
90US president
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
91Says Iran’s conditions are “nothing new”. He doubts Witkoff can deliver: twice, he said, Witkoff called their talks “productive and good”, only for the US to bomb Iran the next day.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
“The conditions we have asked the US to meet is nothing new, nothing more than what was already in the Islamabad agreement, which was signed by the US president,” Araghchi said.
- Supports
In particular, he admitted to being sceptical that Witkoff could deliver. He recounted how he had twice held talks with Trump’s special envoy, after which Witkoff had described them as “productive and good”, only for the US to bomb Iran the next day.
92Abbas Araghchi
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
93Iran’s foreign minister
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
94Admits Iranians want the war to end, but says the public has withstood sanctions for 45 years.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
Pezeshkian, who handed all questions about the talks to Araghchi, admitted Iranians wanted the war to end and did not deny the economic pressure, but said the public had withstood sanctions for 45 years.
95Masoud Pezeshkian
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
96Iran’s president
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
97A faction in Iran argues that Tehran should escalate the conflict while the US president is vulnerable, rather than let the deadlock drift. Praising Pezeshkian’s UN speech, the Revolutionary Guards commander, Ahmad Vahidi, said: “We are not afraid of war.”
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
A faction inside Iran is arguing that Tehran should seek to escalate the conflict with a vulnerable US president
- Supports
rather than let the crisis drift in its current deadlock
- Supports
Maj Gen Ahmad Vahidi, commander-in-chief of the IRGC, praised Pezeshkian’s speech, saying: “We are not afraid of war.
98Other voices in Iran
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
99Inside the system
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
100Democrat Seth Moulton: “Remember when Donald Trump said that this war would last just a few weeks?” Republican Brian Mast says Trump is against “forever wars, and that is what he is ending”, meaning decades of hostilities from Iran.
- SourceUS House votes for third time to end Iran war after $38bn cost is revealed (15 September 2026)
- Supports
“Remember when Donald Trump said that this war would last just a few weeks?” said Democrat Seth Moulton before the vote.
- Supports
Mast said Trump is against “forever wars, and that is what he is ending”, meaning decades of hostilities from Iran.
101Congress
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
102Divided
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
103Around the table
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
104Israel
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
105Iranian officials fear Israel will pull Trump away from the deal. Israel may object to giving Iran such clear control over the shipping route.
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
fear Israel will use its influence to pull the US president away from the proposal
- Supports
Israel may object to giving Iran such clear control over the route through which ships would travel through the strait of Hormuz.
106Oman
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
107Has agreed the new route with Iran, Iran says.
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
Iran says a deal on the temporary route through the strait of Hormuz has been agreed with Oman
108Saudi Arabia
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
109Concerned that the route deal leaves out the other Gulf states as joint signatories.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
Saudi Arabia is also concerned that the route deal is bilateral between Iran and Oman, and not with the Gulf states as joint signatories.
110China
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
111Fully supports the proposal, according to Araghchi.
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
He added that he had consulted on the plan with China, which fully supported the proposal.
112UK
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
113Its foreign secretary, Ed Miliband, met Araghchi in New York, the first meeting between UK and Iranian ministers for a year. He said the UK wanted a diplomatic solution and freedom of navigation in the strait.
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
It was also the first meeting between UK and Iranian ministers for a year
- Supports
Miliband made clear that the UK was committed to freedom of navigation in the strait and wanted a diplomatic solution
Opinion: is it a war?
114Is it even a war?
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
115Opinion
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
116Arwa Mahdawi, Guardian columnist
- SourceThe situation in Iran is dangerously escalating – but whatever you do, don’t call it a war (14 September 2026)
- Supports
Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist
117Mahdawi argues that the administration keeps insisting this is not a war, and that this matters because only Congress can declare one. She quotes JD Vance, the vice-president: “I wouldn’t call it a war.” And she quotes Trump at a fundraising dinner in March: “They don’t like the word ‘war’ because you’re supposed to get approval.”
- SourceThe situation in Iran is dangerously escalating – but whatever you do, don’t call it a war (14 September 2026)
- Supports
as government officials keep insisting, what’s happening in Iran isn’t actually a war
- Supports
the constitution is very clear that a president can’t unilaterally start an official war on a whim; only Congress has the power to declare a war
- Supports
“I wouldn’t call it a war,” JD Vance told reporters early this month
- Supports
“They don’t like the word ‘war’ because you’re supposed to get approval.
- Supports
Trump said at a fundraising dinner in March
118“What we call this ‘military conflict’ isn’t just semantics, it matters greatly.”
- SourceThe situation in Iran is dangerously escalating – but whatever you do, don’t call it a war (14 September 2026)
- Supports
What we call this “military conflict” isn’t just semantics, it matters greatly.
119This is the only opinion piece in the Storyline.
- NoteFraming text: describes the contents of the Storyline data.
What happens next
120What happens next
- NoteHeading or label: makes no claim beyond facts sourced elsewhere on the page
121Araghchi said he would stay in New York over the weekend to wait for an American answer, but was not in a hurry.
- SourceIran awaiting response from Trump on proposal to open strait of Hormuz in six days (24 September 2026)
- Supports
Araghchi said he was staying in New York over the weekend to await an American response, but added he was not in a hurry.
122The US midterm elections are in November, and the White House is under pressure to bring down oil prices before then.
- SourceIran denies dropping preconditions amid ‘very productive’ three-hour UN talks in New York (23 September 2026)
- Supports
The US side is under pressure to leverage down oil prices and increase the availability of refined oil before the midterm elections in November.
123For Patrick Wintour, the real question for Trump is whether he is prepared to go back to war after the midterms, and if not, whether he believes the US can squeeze Iran’s economy until its leadership gives in.
- SourceTrump faces tough choices as Iran dangles deal to reopen Hormuz before US midterms (25 September 2026)
- Supports
Is he prepared to go back to war with Iran after the midterms and, if not, does he believe the US can squeeze the Iranian economy so hard that the leadership will succumb.
Checks
- Start of the war. The UN speech article says the US and Israel "launched joint strikes in February" but gives no year. The page says "February" only.
- Six days or seven? Iran's offer is reported both as opening the strait "in six days" (headline, 24 September) and "within seven days" (Araghchi, same article). The 25 September article explains the timetable: the strait reopens on day six and nuclear talks begin on day seven. The diagram follows that article.
- Oil prices. The articles give Brent crude at $64 a barrel before the fighting and $103 "at its peak" (the CBO article, 15 September), below $100 on 23 September and about $107 on 24 September. The $103 peak conflicts with the later $107 figure, probably because the CBO report covered an earlier period, but the article does not say. The page uses only the $64 and $107 figures, each dated and cited, and does not use the word "peak".
- Minab school strike. The CBO article says the strike on the first day of the war killed 156 people including 120 children. Arwa Mahdawi's column describes a school strike "in March" that killed 150 people including 120 children. The two also conflict on timing: the war began in February, according to the UN speech article, so "the first day of the war" and "in March" cannot both be right. The page uses the news article's figures, says only "on the war's first day" without a month, places it under 15 September (when the Guardian reported it), and does not say who carried out the strike, because the article only says the Pentagon has an internal investigation.
- The talks in New York. The 23 September article does not say which day the three-hour talks took place. The page dates them as reported on 23 September.
- Patrick Wintour's analysis. The 25 September article is analysis. Judgments in it (for example, that ending Israel's attacks in Lebanon is "probably most difficult of all") are attributed to him.
- Left out. The UN speech article's material on Greenland, Cuba, Venezuela, Ukraine and AI; the 23 September article's material on Gaza and speeches by Emmanuel Macron and King Abdullah; the grounding of Iran's civil aircraft; and the Pentagon inspector general's figures. All are relevant but not needed for a five-minute read.
- Opinion. Arwa Mahdawi's column is the only opinion piece. It is labelled as opinion, and quotes from Trump and JD Vance that appear only in her column are introduced as quoted by her.
- Images. None. The page uses type, colour and a diagram only.